Benson v. City of San Diego
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California
On motion to strike from the files the second amended bill, and on demurrer and application for leave to file plea in abatement.
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, Circuit Judge.
This case is now presented to the court upon a second amended bill of complaint, which all of the defend*159ants except the San Diego Water Company have moved to strike from the files, and to which all of the defendants except that company have filed a demurrer, and have also asked leave to file a plea in abatement. In the original bill the Consolidated Water Company, a West Virginia corporation, was the sole complainant. It brought the suit as the owner and holder of certain bonds issued by the Ban Diego Water Company, secured by a mortgage executed by that company upon the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lombard v. MorseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Morford v. DieffenbackerMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Richmond & Danville Railroad v. Bedell & BowersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. Town of BoswellIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Buckland v. GreenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Knickerbocker Trust Co. v. City of KalamazooU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Michigan · 1910
- Los Angeles City Water Co. v. City of Los AngelesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1900