Buckland v. Green
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Contract by “ Georgie A. Buckland, administratrix of the estate of J. P. Buckland, late of Holyoke in said county, deceased,” on an account annexed, for services alleged to have been rendered by the plaintiff’s intestate. The writ was dated March 30, 1881, and alleged that “this action is brought for the benefit of William G. White, of Chicopee, in said county, the equitable owner of said claim.”
Read the full summary
Contract by “ Georgie A. Buckland, administratrix of the estate of J. P. Buckland, late of Holyoke in said county, deceased,” on an account annexed, for services alleged to have been rendered by the plaintiff’s intestate. The writ was dated March 30, 1881, and alleged that “this action is brought for the benefit of William G. White, of Chicopee, in said county, the equitable owner of said claim.” The answer denied each and every material allegation in the plaintiff’s declaration, alleged payment, and contained the following: “ And the defendant for further answer says, that, prior to the…
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
The allowance of the amendment was within the discretion of the Superior Court. Winch v. Hosmer, 122 Mass. 438. Exceptions overruled.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Winch v. HosmerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
3Cited by10 opinions
- McDonald v. NebraskaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- Bigelow v. DraperNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
- Attorney General v. HenryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Costelo v. CrowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
- Wilson v. WelchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.