Legal Opinion
Saarman Construction, Ltd. v. Ironshore Specialty Insurance Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 31, 2017No. Case No. 15-cv-03548-JSTPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER GRANTING DE-PENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT1
Re: ECF Nos. 34, 35, 130
JON S. TIGAR, United States District Judge
Before the Court are Defendant Iron-shore Specialty Insurance’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiff Saarman Construction’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. The Court grants Iron-shore’s motion and denies Saarman’s motion.
1. BACKGROUND
A. The Condominium Repairs
The Westborough Court Condominiums, located in the City of South San Francisco, were developed and constructed in the late 1990’s. ECF No.…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- ZURICH AM. INS. CO. VS. IRONSHORE SPECIALTY INS. (NRAP 5)Nevada Supreme Court · 2021