Legal Opinion

United States v. Tanh Huu Lam

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 4, 2001No. 99-10463PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BETTY B. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

This is a direct appeal from a federal conviction for arson resulting in death, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 844(i). The appellant, Tanh Huu Lam, raises two types of claims: First, he argues that his constitutional and statutory rights to a speedy trial were violated. Second, Lam claims that the government violated his due process and double jeopardy rights by knowingly presenting false testimony and committing other forms of prosecutorial misconduct during his trial. For the reasons elaborated below, we reject each of these claims and affirm the conviction.

I

Lam…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Dock McNeely v. Lou BlanasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. United States v. Clarence Kenneth GormanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. Jack Alan Geston, United States of America v. Jack Alan GestonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. SutcliffeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. Dale Roy CombsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API