Legal Opinion
Dock McNeely v. Lou Blanas
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 17, 2003No. 02-15860PublishedCited by 171 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed on April 18, 2003, and reported at 326 F.3d 1066, is withdrawn and replaced by the amended opinion filed concurrently with this order. With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judges Tashima and Wardlaw vote to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Noonan so recommends. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, but no judge of the court has called a vote on en banc rehearing. The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are denied. See Fed. RApp. P. 35(f). No…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Smith v. HooeySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- People v. MarsdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by171 opinions
- Joel White v. John Lambert, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- State v. AriegweMontana Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re: Terrence Wright v.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
- Steven Donald Stow v. Albert MurashigeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- State v. GarzaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
166 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.