Legal Opinion
In Re Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Texas
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided August 27, 1998No. 05-98-01132-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MALONEY, Justice.
Relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion to stay trial court proceedings. In the petition, Relators contend the trial court erred in setting a rule 76a hearing to determine whether certain documents were “court documents” subject to disclosure. Specifically, relators contend no rule 76a order was entered in the underlying case before its dismissal and the trial court has no extended jurisdiction to consider “modification” of a rule 11 agreement after its plenary jurisdiction expired. Real party in interest, intervenor Dallas Morning News…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. MoralesTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- General Tire, Inc. v. KeppleTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Womack-Humphreys Architects, Inc. v. Barrasso, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re the Dallas Morning News, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re the Dallas Morning News, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
- Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. and Toyota Motor Corporation v. Benjamin Thomas Reavis and Kristi Carol Reavis, Individually and as Next Friends of E.R. and O.R., Minor Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2021
- in Re: Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Texas, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, and Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1999