Legal Opinion

Chesney v. Chesney

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 2002No. 2000-CT-01948-SCTPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

849 So.2d 860 (2002)

Mitchell Lamar CHESNEY

v.

Cynthia Ann Howington CHESNEY.

No. 2000-CT-01948-SCT.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

October 3, 2002.

Leslie R. Brown, Jackson, attorney for appellant.

Lawrence Primeaux, Meridian, attorney for appellee.

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI

CARLSON, Justice, for the Court.

¶ 1. Mitchell Lamar Chesney (Mitchell) and Cynthia Ann Howington Chesney (Cindy) were granted an irreconcilable differences divorce by the Chancery Court of Lauderdale County. The parties were unable to agree on matters relating to post-divorce child support, division of marital assets, and alimony.…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. McKee v. McKeeMississippi Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Hemsley v. HemsleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Cheatham v. CheathamMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Dillon v. DillonMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Cooper v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. R.K. v. J.K.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Chesney v. ChesneyMississippi Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Williams v. WilliamsMississippi Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Huseth v. HusethMississippi Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Dale Patrick Miller v. Jessica Dawn SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API