Legal Opinion

Huseth v. Huseth

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 2014No. 2012-CA-01576-SCTPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KITCHENS, Justice, for the Court:

¶ 1. Michael Huseth (Mike) appeals the judgment of the Chancery Court of the First Judicial District of Hinds County which granted his wife Tavia Huseth (Ta-via) an award of separate maintenance, full physical custody of their son, and attorney fees. Tavia has requested attorney fees on appeal equal to half of the fees she was awarded at trial. We affirm the chancellor’s judgment in part, reverse it in part and remand the case to the chancery court, and we deny Tavia’s request for attorney fees on appeal.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2. Mike and Tavia have…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Albright v. AlbrightMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Tedford v. DempseyMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Brabham v. BrabhamMississippi Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Smith v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
  5. City of Madison v. BryanMississippi Supreme Court · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Roger Dale Latham v. Michele Ann LathamMississippi Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Gregory Dailey v. Tracie McBeath FairleyCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2014
  3. Aubrey M. Edwards v. William Brad EdwardsMississippi Supreme Court · 2025
  4. Benardrick Cornelius McKinney v. Kasey HampMississippi Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Benardrick Cornelius McKinney v. Kasey HampMississippi Supreme Court · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API