Legal Opinion
United States v. Henry L. Martin
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 27, 1999No. 98-4000PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANION, Circuit Judge.
During Henry Martin’s trial for bank robbery he asserted as part of his defense that because he was financially secure he had no motive to rob the bank. While cross-examining Martin, the prosecutor inquired about an apparent inconsistency between Martin’s assertion of financial security and the indigence he claimed in the financial disclosure form which he filed to obtain a free attorney. As Martin’s responses to the prosecutor were somewhat ambiguous and contradictory, the district judge questioned Martin further on some of the points raised. Because this questioning…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Charles COLLINS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. D.J. KIBORT and Educational Therapy Center, Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Larry D. HallCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Candelaria-SilvaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Larry Gene Bell v. Parker Evatt, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General, State of South CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Algie Crivens v. Thomas P. Roth, Warden, Dixon Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Grace M. Kapelanski and Stanley J. Kapelanski v. Scott JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- United States v. CurryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Cedric WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. BlanchardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.