Becker v. Lagerquist Bros., Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
55 Wn.2d 425 (1960)
348 P.2d 423
RODNEY A. BECKER et al., Respondents,
v.
LAGERQUIST BROTHERS, INC., Appellant.[1]
No. 34535.
The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
January 14, 1960.
McCann, Barnett & Towne (Vernon W. Towne, of counsel), for appellant.
MacDonald, Hoague & Bayless, for respondents.
FOSTER, J.
Appellant corporation, defendant below, appeals from a judgment requiring specific performance of an oral agreement to pave a street or, in the alternative, to pay the cost thereof.
The gravamen of appellant's contention is that, under the parol evidence rule, the earnest-money receipt precluded…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Mitchill v. LathNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Webster v. L. Romano Engineering Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
- Durkin v. CobleighMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Carr v. DooleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Barber v. RochesterWashington Supreme Court · 1958
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.