Legal Opinion

Becker v. Lagerquist Bros., Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1960No. 34535Published

1Opinion of the Court

55 Wn.2d 425 (1960)

348 P.2d 423

RODNEY A. BECKER et al., Respondents,

v.

LAGERQUIST BROTHERS, INC., Appellant.[1]

No. 34535.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

January 14, 1960.

McCann, Barnett & Towne (Vernon W. Towne, of counsel), for appellant.

MacDonald, Hoague & Bayless, for respondents.

FOSTER, J.

Appellant corporation, defendant below, appeals from a judgment requiring specific performance of an oral agreement to pave a street or, in the alternative, to pay the cost thereof.

The gravamen of appellant's contention is that, under the parol evidence rule, the earnest-money receipt precluded…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Mitchill v. LathNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Webster v. L. Romano Engineering Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Durkin v. CobleighMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  4. Carr v. DooleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  5. Barber v. RochesterWashington Supreme Court · 1958

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API