Legal Opinion

Midland National Bank v. Hendrickson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 16, 1924No. 24,137PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This case is before the court on an order to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not issue directing that the case be remanded to Ramsey county for trial. It was commenced there, but the venue was changed to Wilkin county in the summary manner provided by statute. A motion to remand was made and denied.

The defendants Hendrickson, doing business as Hendrickson Brothers, have completed a contract for the construction of a section of state highway in Wilkin county. The admitted balance due them from the state is $5,547.53. The plaintiff and defendants Knudson and Wolverton State Bank, each…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance v. DunlevySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Hanna v. . StedmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. Tuck v. ManningMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  4. Mann v. FlowerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
  5. Mann v. FlowerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Midland National Bank v. HendricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. State Ex Rel. Northwestern National Bank v. District Court Eleventh Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  3. Radabaugh v. H. D. Hudson Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  4. Dillage v. Lincoln Nat. L. Ins. Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API