Legal Opinion

Bolden v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 18, 2000No. S99G1005PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fletcher, Presiding Justice.

After Stanley C. Bolden objected during closing argument to the solicitor’s improper argument, the trial court overruled the objection and Bolden made no further objection. On appeal, the Court of Appeals of Georgia held that Bolden waived his objection by failing to renew it or move for a mistrial. Contrary to that holding, Bolden was not required to request further relief after his objection was overruled to preserve the issue for appellate review. We reverse because we cannot conclude that the solicitor’s improper bolstering did not contribute to the verdict.

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shirley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  2. Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  3. Hall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  4. Davie v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  5. Bolden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Ellington v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
  2. Woods v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  3. O'NEAL v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  4. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  5. Fincher v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API