Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Department of Motor Vehicles
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 15, 1994No. D018039PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KREMER, P. J.
—Plaintiff Travis Edwin Jackson appeals a judgment denying his petition for administrative mandate against the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV). Jackson attacks the judgment as without substantial evidentiary support. We affirm.
I
Introduction
The DMV suspended Jackson’s driver’s license for driving under the influence of alcohol. Jackson lost at an administrative hearing. He also unsuccessfully sought mandate in the superior court. Jackson now appeals, contending the DMV did not present substantial evidence he (1) was driving or in control of the vehicle or (2) had .08…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Burg v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Taylor v. Centennial Bowl, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Davenport v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Rousseau v. West Coast House MoversCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Imachi v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Manriquez v. GourleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Coffey v. ShiomotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Baker v. GourleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Bussard v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Morgenstern v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.