Legal Opinion

Newhouse v. First Nat. Bank of Chicago

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided July 22, 1926No. 3856PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, District Judge.

Gold-Sta-beck Company, of Minneapolis, dealer in securities and investments and trustee under certain trust deeds securing bonds, was, from and after 1909 until its receivership in 1921, a general commercial depositor of defendant in Chicago. On November 8, 1921, the depositor forwarded to defendant for deposit a check for $20,087.70, drawn on the Waterloo, Iowa, Savings Bank, payable to Clarence W. Austin, and indorsed by him to depositor, *888who in turn indorsed it to defendant, who thereupon entered it to the credit of depositor, whose balance was then several thousand…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Merrill v. National Bank of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Kerrison v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Wulzen v. Bd. of Supervisors of City & Cty of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Carey v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  5. In re BatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1886

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Slay v. Mary Couts Burnett TrustCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  2. Brown v. LochridgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Flannery Bolt Co. v. GreensladeDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. (PC) Sosa v. FoulkDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API