Legal Opinion

Whitman v. Consolidated Aluminum Corp.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 23, 1982No. 12381PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Judge.

Plaintiffs alleged that a ladder manufactured by defendant “buckled, broke and collapsed”, causing plaintiff Arthur Whitman (Arthur) to fall from it and suffer permanent injuries. Plaintiff Darlene Whitman (Darlene) is Arthur’s wife. A label on it said the ladder was “200 pound duty rated”. Arthur testified that he relied on those words on the label in purchasing the ladder from a Wal-Mart store. He testified that there was less than 200 pounds on it when it collapsed. He is a sign painter and was painting a sign above the entrance to a grocery store when the fall occurred.

Plain…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Westerhold v. CarrollSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  2. Cryts v. Ford Motor Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Worley v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. Berry v. Federal Kemper Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Wilson v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rust & Martin, Inc. v. AshbyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Thorpe v. Hammons Sheet Metal Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Reinbold v. AGCO CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2023
  4. SILIPENA v. AMERICAN PULVERIZER COMPANYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API