State v. Blondin
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtHolden, C.J.
The respondent is awaiting trial after indictment for the crime of murder. During this interval the respondent moved to suppress certain oral and written statements made to officers of the Vermont state police, without benefit of counsel, at the time of, and immediately following, his arrest. The basis for this aspect of the motion is that the statements were taken in violation of the accused’s state and federal constitutional rights against involuntary self-incrimination, contrary to Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436. The motion further seeks to suppress and compel the return of certain…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- DiBella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. BadgerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
- State v. StreichSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
- State v. BrunoSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- State v. EmiloSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.