Legal Opinion
State v. Emilo
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided June 8, 1984No. 82-493PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBillings, C.J.
Defendant appeals his conviction in the Addison District Court on the charge of operating a motor vehicle without the consent of the owner. 23 V.S.A. § 1094. Prior to the trial on the merits, defendant filed a motion to suppress, V.R.Cr.P. 12(b)(3), requesting that “all information, statements and physical evidence” gathered subsequent to his arrest be suppressed on the ground that the stopping of his car was effected without reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing, in violation of the-.Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The motion was denied. At the trial before the court,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. MarcelloSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- State v. SenecalSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
- State v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- State v. KettlewellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
- State v. SutphinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.