Legal Opinion

Steward v. City of Anchorage

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1964No. 383PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOND, Justice.

Appellant was injured when he tripped and fell over a stub of a broken sign post protruding from a sidewalk in the City of Anchorage. He brought suit against the City on a claim of negligence and was awarded judgment. On appeal, we reversed the judgment and remanded the case for a new trial because of the trial court’s erroneous view of the law of contributory negligence. 1 A new trial was held. At its conclusion the court found that the City had been negligent in its failure to remove the pipe stub, but that appellant’s claim was barred by his own contributory negligence. On…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Commissioner v. DubersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. CHIRIKOFF ISLAND CATTLE CORPORATION v. RobinetteAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  4. City of Anchorage v. StewardAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Link v. PatrickAlaska Supreme Court · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. PhillipsAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Palfy v. RiceAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Day v. a & G Construction Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Preferred General Agency of Alaska, Inc. v. RaffettoAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Milne v. AndersonAlaska Supreme Court · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API