Legal Opinion
Highsmith v. Chrysler Credit Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 10, 1993No. 92 C 475PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM, OPINION AND ORDER
ANDERSEN, District Judge.
This case is before the court on the motion of defendant Chrysler Credit Corporation (“Chrysler Credit”) to dismiss the amended complaint of plaintiffs Kelvin Highsmith, Marcita Highsmith and Joseph Villasenor pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). For the reasons discussed in this memorandum opinion and order, the motion to dismiss is granted.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs have filed this action under the federal Consumer Leasing Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1667, the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Practices Act, Ill.Rev.Stat., ch. 121 Vk, para. 261, the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kelvin Highsmith, Marcita Highsmith, and Joseph Villasenor v. Chrysler Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Valencia Carmichael v. Nissan Motor AcceptanceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- In Re OnStar Contract LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
- Turner v. E-Z Check Cashing of Cookeville, TN, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1999
- Durant v. Servicemaster Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002