Legal Opinion

Halliday v. Collins Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 1, 1900PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Plea in abatement to an appeal taken by the plaintiffs from a judgment rendered by the Superior Court in Hartford County, Prentice, J., in favor of the defendant. The appellee also filed a motion to erase. The facts are sufficiently set forth in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtTobbance, J.

The ground of abatement alleged in the plea is, in substance, that the appeal was not taken within the time prescribed by law.

The allegations of the plea were denied, and the issues thus formed were referred to a state referee. The report of the referee was accepted by this court, and is made a part of the record. From this it appears that final judgment in the case was rendered on the 14th day of January, 1899; that on the 18th day of the same month a notice of appeal was filed by the plaintiffs; that on the 14th day of February, 1899, the judge who tried the case filed a finding of facts…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Comstock's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1886

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Reilly v. Antonio Pepe Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  2. Norton v. Shore Line Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
  3. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. IllySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
  4. Forbes v. Town of OrangeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
  5. Wake v. ThomsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API