Wake v. Thoms
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Appeal bjr the plaintiffs from a judgment in favor of the defendant in the District Court of Waterbury. In this court the defendants filed a plea in abatement, upon the ground that the appeal was not seasonably taken.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
The defendants’ plea in abatement to the plaintiffs’ appeal to this court alleges that the finding of facts was filed by the trial judge with the clerk of the District Court on January 31st, 1905, and the plaintiffs notified thereof on February 7th, 1905, when they filed a motion to correct the finding; that the motion to correct was denied February 24th, 1905, and the appeal to this court taken March 7th, 1905; that the finding was never refiled, nor the time for filing an appeal extended by the judge.
In their answer the plaintiffs admit that the finding was filed with the clerk in the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hourigan v. City of NorwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
- Halliday v. Collins Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cramer v. ReebSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- New Milford Savings Bank v. LedererSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930