Legal Opinion

Becker v. Sherwin Williams

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided July 17, 1989No. Civ. 88-3863PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SAROKIN, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

We have the most remarkable judicial system in the world. Although litigation expenses have risen dramatically over the years, the courts remain open to anyone to pursue legitimate claims no matter what a person’s financial condition or station in life. Those who cannot afford to pay even the required filing fee are nonetheless granted access to the courts. It is because of this essential policy of openness that we must be wary of those persons who block the entryway to or abuse the system.

Every frivolous suit requires time and attention and diverts…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Watson v. City of SalemDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
  2. Forbes v. RenoDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Mitchell v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Emilien v. Stull Technologies Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API