Legal Opinion
Forbes v. Reno
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 27, 1995No. Civ. A. 94-1225PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER OF COURT
AMBROSE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Kipling Delano Forbes (“Forbes”), acting pro se, has filed this action seeking damages for alleged statutory and constitutional violations arising out of the investigation of charges of discrimination filed with Defendant Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”). In addition to the EEOC, Forbes has named as defendants United States Attorney General Janet Reno and the United States Department of Justice (together, the “Government Defendants”), as well as various individual officers and employees of the EEOC. To this date,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Occidental Life Insurance v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Hearst Corporation, Doing Business as the Houston Chronicle Publishing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Storey v. RubinDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1997
- D'Alessandro v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2002
- Andray McWilliams v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, et al.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2026
- Doe v. Office of Inspector General (OIG)District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.