Legal Opinion

United States v. Hayes

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 28, 1975No. Crim. A. No. 74-191PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WEBER, District Judge.

Defendants William Edward Hayes, Jr. and Patrick Edward Mertens have filed motions for a new trial following their convictions on the conspiracy count and all substantive counts as charged in the indictment. Many of the grounds pleaded in these motions had been considered and ruled on at a previous stage of these proceedings in pretrial motions and hearings. Upon reconsideration of each of the defendants’ claims we find no cause to reverse our prior holdings.

The first claim of error is the denial of the pretrial motions of both defendants for a bill of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. United States v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. VanPelt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2009
  2. United States v. VanegasDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
  3. United States v. HayesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API