Legal Opinion

United States v. Vanegas

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided October 28, 1986No. Crim. No. 85-430PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODRIGUEZ, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the government’s motion to compel the production of handwriting exemplars from eight defendants pursuant to Rule 17(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Of these eight defendants from whom exemplars are sought, only two, Luis Cuevas and Juan Muriel, have filed objections to this motion to compel.1 Defendant Juan Muriel objects to the government’s application on the ground that it is untimely and if granted will necessitate expert’s reports which will in turn delay the start of the trial. Defendant Luis Cuevas objects on…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. United States v. MaraSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. CherryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  2. United States v. MessercolaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
  3. United States v. Victor Arditti, United States of America v. Guillermo AvilaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. Victor Arditti, United States of America v. Guillermo AvilaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API