State v. Hemenover
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction.— Hon. Hiram W. Moore, Judge. Appellant’s demurrer to the State’s evidence should have been sustained, as appellant was charged in the information as the manager of a corporation and there was no such proof.
Read the full summary
Appeal from St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction.— Hon. Hiram W. Moore, Judge. Appellant’s demurrer to the State’s evidence should have been sustained, as appellant was charged in the information as the manager of a corporation and there was no such proof. According to the evidence the defendant was a stockholder, a director, a secretary, and had, hy courtesy, the title of president; looked after the buying and had charge of the manufacturing; had control of some of the departments; helped hire the foremen; but neither he, nor any one else, had exclusive charge of the place. He had the same…
1Opinion of the CourtGantt, J.
This is a prosecution by information filed by the. assistant prosecuting attorney of the St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction, charging the defendant, as manager of the Banner Rubber Company, with having, on the 19th of January, 1904, in the city of St. Louis, wilfully and unlawfully suffered to be emitted and discharged from the smokestack ór chimney of a certain building belonging to said Banner Rubber Company, and situated at the corner of Bittner and Kendrick streets in said city, and within the corporate limits of said city, dense smoke into the open air, in violation of “An act to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. TowerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kelly v. Newark Shoe Stores Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Coffman v. Shell Petroleum Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1934
- City of Monett v. HallMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907
- State v. EyermannMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
- Whiteley v. Eagle-Picher Lead Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1938