Legal Opinion

Coffman v. Shell Petroleum Corp.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 1934PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTrimble, J.

As we understand it, this is a suit for damages for malicious prosecution, although one of the parties to this appeal refers to it as a suit for false arrest and malicious prosecution. If we mistake not, there is a difference between the two. Technically, or rather correctly speaking, a suit for false arrest or false imprisonment is the proper action where the aggrieved person is arrested without legal process; but where the process on which the arrest was made is regular on its face, but was sued out maliciously and without probable cause, the remedy of the injured person is an action for…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hanser v. BieberSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
  2. Irons v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  3. Foster v. Chicago, Burlington Quincy Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  4. Ex parte BedardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  5. State Ex Rel. Mann v. TrimbleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Gowin v. HeiderOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Barnes Ex Rel. Barnes v. Real Silk Hosiery MillsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  3. Palermo v. CottomMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Gray v. WallaceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  5. Lee Young v. Jack Boring's, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API