Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Wasserman

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided January 30, 1985PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Renee R. Roth, S.

In this proceeding, the executor of the estate of a deceased “tenant in occupancy” petitions the court to compel the sponsor of an offering plan to accept and complete a subscription agreement signed by the executor on behalf of the deceased tenant’s estate.

The facts, which are not disputed, are as follows:

On June 14,1983, the sponsor, Coronet Properties Company, filed, and the Attorney-General accepted, a plan for the conversion of 710 West End Avenue to cooperative status.

On that date, Herman L. Wasserman (the decedent) was alive and a rent-controlled…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. 10 West 66th Street Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. De Christoforo v. Shore Ridge AssociatesNew York Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Colorado National Bank of Denver v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. De Christoforo v. Shore Ridge AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Freudenstein v. 645 Co.New York Supreme Court · 1985
  4. De Kovessey v. Coronet Properties Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API