Legal Opinion
Freudenstein v. 645 Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 11, 1985PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Harold Baer, Jr., J.
Plaintiffs, Jutta Freudenstein and Hannah Kaiser, individually and as executrices of their deceased mother’s estate, seek to enjoin defendants, 645 Company (the Company), 645 West End Avenue Corp. (the Corporation) and Orsid Realty Co. (Orsid), from issuing a proprietary lease or selling the shares of stock appurtenant to apartment No. 2C, 645 West End Avenue, New York, New York (the Apartment). The Corporation seeks to be discharged from the action and also seeks attorneys’ fees and costs.
Rosel Meyer, deceased mother of plaintiffs, resided in the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stern v. . Equitable Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Bryant Westchester Realty Corp. v. Board of HealthNew York Supreme Court · 1977
- Stern v. Equitable Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- 829 Seventh Avenue Co. v. ReiderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- De Christoforo v. Shore Ridge AssociatesNew York Supreme Court · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. BatistaCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1985