Legal Opinion

West Texas Utilities Co. v. Exxon Coal USA, Inc.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1991No. 90-190, 90-191PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MACY, Justice.

West Texas Utilities Co. appeals from the district court’s ruling that Exxon Coal USA, Inc. may select either of the remedies enumerated in the parties’ contract if West Texas repudiates that contract.

We affirm in part and reverse in part.

West Texas raises the following issues:

I. The District Court erred by misinterpreting the Coal Sale and Purchase Agreements (the “Contracts”) to allow Exxon, upon a repudiation by [West Texas], to hold the Contract open for up to 20 years and to seek annual “Minor Breach” liquidated damages instead of “Major Breach” liquidated damages.

II.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Northern Indiana Public Service Company, an Indiana Corporation v. Carbon County Coal Company, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  2. L.U. Sheep Co. v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Holly Sugar Corp. v. FritzlerWyoming Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Preston Ridge Financial Services Corp. v. Tyler, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  5. Booth v. Magee Carpet CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Department of Revenue & Taxation v. PacificorpWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Southwestern Public Service Co. v. Thunder Basin Coal Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Durdahl v. National Safety Associates, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Kedy v. A.W. Chesterton Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  5. Bromley v. MitchellAlaska Supreme Court · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API