Legal Opinion

Bromley v. Mitchell

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1995No. S-6399/6449PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Alaska resident Raymond Bromley entered into an agreement with Yacht Doc, a Washington company, to purchase a sport fishing vessel. Bromley also entered into an agreement with Mitchell Marine Service, another Washington company, to make repairs to the boat. Alleging that both the sales and the repair agreements were breached, Raymond and his wife Carolyn sued John Mitchell, d/b/a Mitchell Marine Service and Yacht Doc, and Jim Henson, d/b/a Yacht Doe.

The superior court ordered the claims against Mitchell and Henson dismissed on grounds of forum non…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Malvo Ex Rel. Malvo v. J. C. Penney Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Stangvik v. Shiley Inc.California Supreme Court · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Valley Hospital Ass'n v. Mat-Su Coalition for ChoiceAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Hughes v. Foster Wheeler Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. JacobAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Asrc Energy Services Power v. Golden Valley Electric Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Sidney v. Allstate Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API