Legal Opinion
Surrency v. Harbison
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided April 25, 1986No. 84-857, 84-900PublishedCited by 87 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
This is an appeal by defendants McNally-Pittsburg Manufacturing Corporation (McNally) and Bill Surrency from a judgment based on a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff, Willis J. Harbison, and a denial of a motion for new trial or judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Harbison cross-appealed from the grant of a directed verdict against him on his outrageous conduct count. We reverse as to the defendants' appeal and remand for new trial on the assault and battery…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Avco Corp. v. Aero Lodge No. 735, International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Linn v. United Plant Guard Workers of America, Local 114Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Wright v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
- Thomas v. BSE Indus. Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Acceptance Ins. Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- Nelson v. Lapeyrouse Grain Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- GREEN TREE ACCEPTANCE v. StandridgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.