Legal Opinion

Olah v. Katz

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1926No. Docket No. 74PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

The defendant real estate company employed the defendant Katz to do some plumbing work in a residence on a lot owned by it in the city of Detroit. • The plaintiff lived on the adjoining lot. In doing this work, Katz caused a hole to be dug near the line between the lots. Some of the witnesses testified that it extended four inches on plaintiff’s lot; others that it was entirely on the company’s lot. There was proof that the hole was 4 feet in diameter and 5 feet, 2 inches in depth. An iron pipe protruded several inches from the bottom of the hole. In the absence of the workmen, plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Powers v. HarlowMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. City of Detroit v. CoreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Wilkinson v. Detroit Steel & Spring WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Douglas v. BerglandMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Kilts v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Bosak v. HutchinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. In Re Certified Question From 14th Dist. Court of Appeals of TexasMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Utley v. Taylor & Gaskin, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Vannoy v. City of WarrenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Grinnell v. Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API