Olah v. Katz
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.
The defendant real estate company employed the defendant Katz to do some plumbing work in a residence on a lot owned by it in the city of Detroit. • The plaintiff lived on the adjoining lot. In doing this work, Katz caused a hole to be dug near the line between the lots. Some of the witnesses testified that it extended four inches on plaintiff’s lot; others that it was entirely on the company’s lot. There was proof that the hole was 4 feet in diameter and 5 feet, 2 inches in depth. An iron pipe protruded several inches from the bottom of the hole. In the absence of the workmen, plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Powers v. HarlowMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- City of Detroit v. CoreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1861
- Wilkinson v. Detroit Steel & Spring WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Douglas v. BerglandMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Kilts v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Bosak v. HutchinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re Certified Question From 14th Dist. Court of Appeals of TexasMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
- Utley v. Taylor & Gaskin, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
- Vannoy v. City of WarrenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Grinnell v. Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.