Legal Opinion

Matheney v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 2005No. 45S00-0509-SD-425PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER CONCERNING SECOND SUCCESSIVE PETITION FOR POST-CONVICTION RELIEF IN CAPITAL CASE

Introduction

Having completed the review to which he is entitled as a matter of right, Petitioner Alan Matheney remains convicted of murder and sentenced to death. Execution of the death sentence is set for September 28, 2005, before sunrise. Mathe-ney, pro se, has tendered a successive post-conviction petition and other doeu-ments requesting relief from the conviction and sentence. We have jurisdiction because, of the death sentence. See Ind. Appellate Rule 4(A)(1)(a).

Background

Matheney was charged with one…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Baum v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Matheney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Alan L. Matheney v. Rondle AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  5. Clay v. Roper, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional CenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. DupigneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  2. Bieghler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Taylor v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Hill v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Cleverly Lockhart v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API