Legal Opinion

State v. Dupigney

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 9, 2010No. SC 18363PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KATZ, J.

This appeal raises an issue of first impression before this court, namely, the meaning and proper application of the standard for obtaining postconviction DNA testing of evidence under General Statutes § 54-102kk (b) (l), 1 pursuant to which a petitioner is entitled to such relief if he demonstrates that a “reasonable probability exists that [he] would not have been prosecuted or convicted if exculpatory results had been obtained through DNA testing . . . .” Following his 2000 conviction for murder and related firearms offenses and an unsuccessful appeal from the judgment of…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Patino v. Birken Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
  2. State v. Sunrise Herbal Remedies, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  3. In re TowneSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  4. Rutter v. JanisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
  5. In re TowneSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API