Legal Opinion

Mavis Hartman v. Brian Smith

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 19, 2013No. 12-1947, 12-2012PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Circuit Judge.

Roger and Mavis Hartman, a married couple, (collectively, “the Hartmans”) and their daughter, Maul Lee Hartman, (collectively, “the plaintiffs”) filed suit seeking damages and rescission under TILA and asserting various state law claims against persons and entities involved in transactions related to the financing of an addition to a house on their property. The district court granted summary judgment to defendants on the TILA rescission claim, dismissed several other claims, and then held a jury trial on the rest. The jury found for the defendants on all remaining…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Webster v. FallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Beach v. Ocwen Federal BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Kohl v. CassonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  4. Rosenfield v. HSBC Bank, USACourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. LamirandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. ASARCO v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  2. Larry Jesinoski v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  3. Bank of America, N.A. v. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  4. Faubel v. Grogg's Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2018
  5. United States v. EmeryUnited States District Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API