United States v. Emery
United States District Court
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTO A. LANGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
A postal employee noticed that a zip-lock baggie containing a white, crystal-like substance had fallen out of an open box addressed to Defendant Steven Emery. The substance looked like drugs and a field test by the police confirmed that it was methamphetamine. Emery argues that the methamphetamine and the evidence seized because of its discovery must be suppressed because the government conducted an illegal search of the box and baggie. This Court denies Emery's motion to suppress because the government did not engage in a Fourth Amendment search…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.