Legal Opinion
People v. Gardner
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 16, 1990No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Upon our review of the record, we conclude that defendant validly waived his right to appeal, which precludes review of the merits of the suppres*938sion court’s denial of his suppression motion (see, People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1; People v Roberts, 152 AD2d 678, 679, lv denied 74 NY2d 851). There is no " 'uniform mandatory catechism of pleading defendants’ ” (People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9, 16; People v Nixon, 21 NY2d 338, 353, cert denied sub nom. Robinson v New York, 393 US 1067), and the record supports the conclusion that defendant, who was represented by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. SeabergNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. NixonNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- People v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. SandersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. GardnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. GardnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.