Legal Opinion
Pham v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
Decided October 14, 2010No. 14-09-00484-CRPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ADELE HEDGES, Chief Justice.
Appellant, Tri M. Pham, appeals from his felony conviction for delivery of a con trolled substance, namely methamphetamine. In three related issues, appellant contends that the trial court violated his constitutional and statutory rights under the federal and state constitutions and article 38.28 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure by admitting evidence seized from a co-defendant’s vehicle. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
I. BACKGROUND
On the afternoon of June 7, 2008, a number of officers from the Houston Police Department were conducting undercover…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Amador v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. MILLARD MALL SERVICES, INC., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
- Foreman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- State v. Sepeda, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
- State v. Simon Property Group, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
- State v. Bell, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.