Legal Opinion

Dorsey v. Kingsland

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 31, 1949No. 9572PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a denial by the District Court of the petition of Vernon M. Dorsey to annul an order of the Patent Office which disbarred appellant from practice before the Patent Office on grounds of gross misconduct. Such facts as are material to the decision in this case are set forth below and are, therefore, not rehearsed at this point.

To the majority of this court the whole record of this case bears indelible evidence that the conduct of the Patent Office in the whole proceeding carried out nearly two decades after the alleged commission of the offense…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. In re MayberryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  4. People ex rel. State Board of Health v. McCoyIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Philadelphia Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kingsland v. DorseySupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. State Ex Rel. Florida Bar v. MurrellSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  3. Collins Securities Corporation and Timothy Collins v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  4. Francis J. Charlton v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  5. Switzer v. CoanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API