Batten v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
YEGAN, J.
In workers’ compensation law, the Legislature has unambiguously declared that a privately retained expert’s opinion evaluating an injured worker is not admissible as evidence before the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. Petitioner Margaret Batten asks us to harmonize what she perceives are conflicting statutes and declare that her privately retained report is admissible. Whether the statutes can be harmonized or not, there is no way to “harmonize” a legislative rule expressly declaring evidence to be inadmissible. There is no ambiguity to clarify, there is nothing to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Coalition of Concerned Communities, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Morris v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Garcia v. McCutchenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Torres v. Parkhouse Tire Service, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Unzueta v. Ocean View School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Guerra v. WCABCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016