Loveman v. Hamilton
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, C. J.
Appellee’s claim for legal malpractice against the Weitzman estate survives, pursuant to R. C. 2305.21, if legal malpractice (1) is a cause of action that survives at common law or (2) constitutes an injury to appellee’s property interests. For the reasons that follow, we find that an accrued cause of action in legal malpractice meets both of the foregoing tests.
Initially, it should be noted that, at common law, actions ex contractu survived the death of a defendant and actions ex delicto did not. Village of Cardington v. Adm’r. of Fredericks (1889), 46 Ohio St. 442, 448. Although a client’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hendrickson v. SearsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Brown v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- McStowe v. BornsteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Porter v. Household Finance Corp. of ColumbusDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1974
- Maryland Casualty Company v. BrownDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Krahn v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Belt v. Oppenheimer, Blend, Harrison & Tate, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
- Jones v. Hyatt Legal Services (In Re Dow)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991
- Tera, L.L.C. v. Rice Drilling D., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
- Paul Cheatham I.R.A. v. Huntington Natl. Bank (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.