Legal Opinion

Regency Park, LP v. City of Topeka

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 4, 1999No. 80,805, 80,806PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Larson, J.:

In this consolidated appeal, plaintiffs, Regency Park, LP, et al., and Tarwater, Inc. et al., paid stormwater utility charges under City of Topeka (City) ordinances which were later declared invalid and appeal the trial court’s decision that they are not entitled to be reimbursed by the City for amounts paid under the ordinances.

The facts are not in dispute and reveal the following history of these two cases.

On July 7, 1992, the City adopted Ordinance Nos. 16472 and 16473 (collectively, the ordinance) which established a stormwater utility…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Ewell v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Kansas Public Employees Retirement System v. Reimer & Koger Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  4. Comm'rs of Wabaunsee Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  5. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. C.I. Mitchell & Best Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Skyland Metropolitan District v. Mountain West Enterprise, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Waterview Resolution Corp. v. AllenSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  3. Bigs v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  4. Winkel v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  5. In Re the Care & Treatment of JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API