State v. Kellerman
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from, Coffey District Court, Information, charging Kellerman with the larceny of a horse, the property of one J. J. Rullier. Trial at the August Term, 1874. The facts, and the errors complained o'f, are sufficiently stated in the opinion. Verdict of guilty. New trial refused, and the defendant appeals to this court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Brewer, J.:
Appellant was convicted in the district court of Coffey county of the crime of grand larceny, and from this conviction brings his appeal to this court. The errors .alleged are in reference to the instructions, and in overruling .a motion for a new trial.
1.instructional falsus in uno, etc. With reference to the first we have little difficulty. The rulings of the court were unquestionably correct. For instance, the appellant asked the court to instruct . , the jury that if one witness, naming him, testified willfully falsely, etc., they must…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Manix v. MalonySupreme Court of Iowa · 1858
- Keough v. McNittSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1861
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
- State v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
- State v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
- Eskridge v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Huster v. WynnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.