Legal Opinion

Yedinak v. Yedinak

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1970No. Calendar 12, Docket 52,151Published

1Opinion of the Court

383 Mich. 409 (1970)

175 N.W.2d 706

YEDINAK

v.

YEDINAK.

Calendar No. 12, Docket No. 52,151.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided April 13, 1970.

Robert J. Scheuerle, for plaintiff.

Scholten & Fant (R. Neal Stanton, of counsel), for defendant.

DETHMERS, J. (for reversal).

I cannot sign the opinions of my esteemed brothers BLACK and ADAMS written in this case. I agree with them that the Court of Appeals and circuit court need some reversing insofar as some provisions of the judgment of divorce relating to property settlement are concerned. I do not agree to remand for determination of rights of defendant's…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Maslen v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Yedinak v. YedinakMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Ashbaugh v. SinclairMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Baugh ex rel. McGuire v. BaughMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Bennett v. NicholsMichigan Supreme Court · 1863

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API