Legal Opinion

Germann v. Blatchford

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 25, 1990No. 62,680PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Holmes, J.:

This is an appeal by the plaintiff, Shirley Germann, from an order of the district court which denied her motion for a new trial based upon the inadequacy of the jury verdict. In an unpublished opinion, Germann v. Blatchford, No. 62,680, filed November 9, 1989, the Court of Appeals reversed the judgment and remanded the case for a new trial on the issue of damages only. We granted petitions for review filed by both defendants, Bonnie Blatchford and Ernest E. Germann. We affirm the decision reached by the Court of Appeals.

On May 10, 1985,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Domann v. PenceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  2. Henderson v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  3. Timmerman v. SchroederSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  4. Furstenberg v. Wesley Medical CenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  5. Brown v. GodfreySupreme Court of Kansas · 1968

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kansas State Bank & Trust Co. v. Specialized Transportation Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  2. Miller v. Zep Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  3. Johnson v. ABLT Trucking Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  4. Kuhl v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  5. Withrow v. CornwellDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API