Legal Opinion

Johnson v. ABLT Trucking Co.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 15, 2005No. 03-3052PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCONNELL, Circuit Judge.

The Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial does not permit entry of a judgment when a jury’s verdict is internally inconsistent. This can occur when, instead of rendering a single general verdict (such as “the defendant owes the plaintiff $100”), the jury renders a “special verdict” (written findings on each issue of fact) or a general verdict accompanied by answers to interrogatories. This Court has interpreted Rule 49 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to require a contemporaneous objection if a party believes a general verdict with special interrogatories is…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. Ellerman Lines, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Wei Zhang v. American Gem Seafoods, Inc., Delaware Corporation McMi Food Company, a Texas Corporation Harry Lees, a Natural PersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Bair v. PeckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  5. Patricia Finnegan v. Richard FountainCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Loughridge v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  2. Hundley Ex Rel. Estate Hundley v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
  3. Martinez v. ValdezDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2015
  4. Culp v. Remington of Montrose Golf ClubCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025
  5. Wilkins v. Packerware Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API