Legal Opinion
Smoke v. City of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
Decided May 22, 1997No. 63615-0PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
937 P.2d 186 (1997)
132 Wash.2d 214
Larry G. SMOKE and Jane C. Smoke, Husband and Wife; Dean Quall and Elizabeth Quall, Husband and Wife; Smoke Quall, Inc., a Washington Corporation, Petitioners,
v.
The CITY OF SEATTLE, a Municipal Corporation, Respondent.
No. 63615-0.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued June 12, 1996.
Decided May 22, 1997.
Groen & Stephens, John Groen, Bellevue, for petitioners.
Mark H. Sidran, Seattle City Atty., Judith B. Barbour, Robert D. Tobin, Asst. Seattle City Attys., Seattle, for Respondent.
Victor J. Wolski, Robin L. Rivett, Sacramento, Amicus Curiae on behalf of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- McNeese v. Board of Education for Community Unit School District 187 CahokiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- King v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- United States Alkali Export Ass'n v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Zylstra v. PivaWashington Supreme Court · 1975
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- City of Seattle v. BlumeWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Laymon v. Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Westway Construction, Inc. v. Benton CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Callfas v. Department of Construction & Land UseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Birnbaum v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.