Legal Opinion

Laymon v. Department of Natural Resources

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 14, 2000No. 23188-3-IIPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeinfeld, J.

Robert and Pamela Laymon sued the *521Washington Department of Natural Resources (DNR), the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW), and the State of Washington (collectively the State) alleging that administrative negligence led to the failure of the Laymons’ real estate development project. The trial court granted summary judgment to the State. Because the Laymons failed to exhaust their administrative remedies before filing suit, we affirm.

FACTS

The Laymons own forested land near Kalama. They planned to develop a residential housing tract on the property and, in July 1993, filed the…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Hartley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Taggart v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Taylor v. Stevens CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Chambers-Castanes v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1983

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Schoonover v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  2. Schoonover v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  3. Hungerford v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  4. Jones v. Department of HealthCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API