Hollipeter v. Stuyvesant Insurance Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SOMERVILLE, Presiding Judge.
The Stuyvesant Insurance Company, defendant below (hereinafter referred to as “Stuyvesant”), has appealed from a summary judgment rendered in favor of Collette F. Hollipeter and Ronald D. Hollipeter, husband and wife, plaintiffs below (hereinafter referred to as “Hollipeters”), in an action for damages for breach of contract.
Stuyvesant banks on one point for appellate relief — the doctrine of election of reme*597dies “barred” the Hollipeters from prosecuting the action for damages for breach of contract.
A rather prolix statement of pertinent facts antedating and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Homan v. Employers Reinsurance Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1940
- Melco System v. Receivers of Trans-America Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- First National Bank of Kansas City v. HigginsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
- Pemberton v. Ladue Realty & Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
- Sliman v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Davis v. Cleary Building Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Owens v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- Venetsanos v. Zucker, Facher & ZuckerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- One Hundred Two Glenstone, Inc. v. BD. OF ADJ. OF CITY OF SPRINGFIELDMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Reynolds v. TinsleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.